🔗 Share this article

Families of people laid to rest in resting places vulnerable to coastal erosion argue that a lack of decision over how to address the issue is creating avoidable anguish about the final resting places of their loved ones.

An Impending Threat to Historic Graveyards

Local authorities have singled out three church graveyards in the villages of Happisburgh, Trimingham, and Mundesley as being at risk of being engulfed by the ocean in the next few generations.

A recent report on the issue details a range of options, from doing nothing to exhuming remains and relocating them in safer sites. Authorities maintain it is for local people to determine how to proceed.

“At the moment we’re in a state of uncertainty. It upsets me. They intended this to serve as their final resting place, but it won't be because of the sea.”

Projections indicate at least part of one churchyard could be claimed by the waves in the next 80 years, but some residents fear it will happen far earlier. “In my view it’s got under 20 years, if you consider what’s occurred in the last 30 years,” a farmer stated.

Haunted by the Past

A local business owner recalled a school trip to the neighbouring village of Eccles, which has largely disappeared into the sea, along with its place of worship and burial ground.

“You could see human remains,” she said. “Certain people hold this romantic idea that the deceased will just get washed out to the ocean. That is not the case. Individuals will collect remains as souvenirs and go plundering graves looking for treasures. That is completely disrespectful.”

“I fear that the identical fate that befell at Eccles will happen at Happisburgh and there’ll be skeletons on the shore. I would feel disgusted by that.”

A Paratrooper's Resting Place in Peril

Along the coast is situated the burial plot of a former paratrooper who died while working overseas. His mother expressed she could not sleep after discovering her son’s final plot might one day be moved.

“It does disturb me to think this may not remain his permanent home,” she said. “To our family it’s an important place to go.”

In her view, new burials should stop but says it is premature to exhume current plots. “My preference for now is to do nothing and closely monitor, but an timely resolution must be made when a critical moment has been reached.”

Searching for Answers and Clarity

The lack of consensus over when and how to tackle the problem has left grieving relatives feeling frustrated and anxious.

Several families want additional sea defences to slow the inevitable erosion and to permit burials to proceed for now. Others argue the moment for relocation is approaching.

“The situation is very emotive,” said one relative. “The official study was thorough, but now there’s confusion about how it is taken forward. And everybody is washing their hands over who is accountable.”

A local official said the burial sites were owned and managed of the local diocese. “Ultimately it is down to them to choose the path to take. Our role is here to assist them through that process with communities.”

It was also stated there was ample time to weigh all the choices. “We are talking decades before it begins getting lost.”

“Currently, there exists no unified opinion on what should happen yet. We need good community discussions to find the right answers for each community.”

The prospect of losing the churches and graveyards was described as one of “immense sadness for the area,” but church representatives also referenced a doctrine in life after death, providing a spiritual perspective on the physical disappearance of hallowed earth.